• Who we are
    • About us
    • Our values
    • Environmental, social & governance
    • Therapeutic areas
  • What we do
    • Consulting (Acsel Health)
    • HEOR & market access
    • Scientific communications
    • Patient engagement
  • Insights
  • News & Events
  • Join us
    • Careers
    • Reasons to join
  • Contact us
  • Menu Menu

Publication Library / Publications

Content validation of the QOL-B-RD and PROMIS-F SF-7a to measure respiratory and fatigue symptoms of MAC lung disease

Introduction

The Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis (QOL-B) questionnaire and Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Short Form v1.0-Fatigue 7a (PROMIS-F SF-7a) have the potential to measure respiratory and fatigue symptoms, respectively, in patients with Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lung disease but have not yet been evaluated for content validity in this population.

Methods

Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted in United States patients with a current MAC lung disease diagnosis. Concept elicitation (CE) interviews were conducted (n = 25 participants) to identify key respiratory and fatigue symptoms expressed as important and relevant to patients with MAC lung disease and to evaluate the appropriateness of the QOL-B and PROMIS-F SF-7a to measure these symptoms. Cognitive interviews (CIs) were subsequently conducted (n = 20 participants) to evaluate the relevance, comprehensibility, and appropriateness of the QOL-B respiratory domain (QOL-B-RD) and PROMIS-F SF-7a. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded for qualitative content analysis.

Results

The most important or relevant respiratory symptom concepts to CE interview participants were “cough,” “shortness of breath during activity,” and “mucus/phlegm.” The most important or relevant fatigue symptom concepts were “tiredness,” “lack of energy,” and “tire easily/low stamina.” These symptoms are covered by existing items in the QOL-B-RD and PROMIS-F SF-7a. Cognitive interview participants’ feedback confirmed the item content, response options, concept attributes, and recall period for each instrument were effective, relevant, and meaningful to most patients with MAC lung disease. Based on Wave 1 findings, the QOL-B instructions were revised for the Wave 2 interviews, where the text referencing “bronchiectasis” was replaced with “your lung condition.” Participant feedback in Wave 2 confirmed the revised instruction wording was easily understood and appropriate.

Conclusion

The study results support the content validity of the QOL-B-RD and PROMIS-F SF-7a, which were shown to be relevant and appropriate to evaluate respiratory and fatigue symptoms, respectively, in patients with MAC lung disease.

Authors Kelly P McCarrier, M Hassan, D W Yuen, J-H Tsai, N Touba, K C Mange
Journal Advances in Therapy
Therapeutic Area Pulmonology and respiratory
Center of Excellence Patient-Centered outcomes
Year 2025
Read full article

Services

  • Consulting
  • HEOR & market access
  • Scientific communications
  • Creative communications
  • Patient engagement

Company

  • About Us
  • Our values
  • Environmental, social & governance
  • Our commitment to rare disease
  • Careers
  • Reasons to join
  • News & insights
  • Events
  • Locations & contact

Legal and Governance

  • Terms of use
  • Privacy notice
  • Cookie policy
  • IT security measures
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Disclosure UK – ABPI
  • Looking for OpenHealth Company?
  • Legal statements & documents
  • Global ethical business conduct code
  • Suppliers
footer-logo-mark
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© Copyright OPEN Health 2025. All rights reserved. OPEN Health is a registered trademark.

backtotop-arrow
Scroll to top